Post by account_disabled on Dec 19, 2023 21:31:49 GMT -6
Being prohibited, in this way, from any form of advertising. The lawsuit was originally brought by taxi associations who claimed they could not compete with Uber on price. Later, in the Court of Appeal in Rome lifted this ban temporarily until the appeal is resolved. Similarly, in Spain a court ruled that the drivers lack the administrative authorization to carry out their activity and at the same time, the activity they perform represents unfair competition. This time, however, starting in , Uber resumed its activity in Spain, using drivers authorized for this purpose. Another interesting situation happened in London . Amid complaints raised by the taxi drivers' association, the city's mayor refused to ban Uber in the absence of a judicial.
Review, so the following question reached the supreme court: can the driver's mobile country email list phone in the car be assimilated to a taxi meter? ! The answer was that a taximeter does not include a device that receives GPS signals during a journey and transmits the GPS data to a server located outside the vehicle, which calculates a fare that is determined in part or in whole by reference to the which , then sends the fare-related information back to the device. The court stated that while the smartphone using the driver's app may be essential to enable fare calculation, this does not make it a fare calculation device . As a result, the app was found to be legal in London. Another court in London ruled in a case that.
Uber drivers are employees entitled to the minimum wage, paid vacation, sick leave and other normal worker rights, rather than self-employed. States that did not object At the opposite pole, however, there are also states where the company has not encountered firm opposition or where the legislation does not contain specific limitations regarding this type of activity, thus being allowed. Among them are Switzerland, Russia, Greece. As technology evolves more and more and the legal issues, in turn, diversify, so that at the moment the jurisprudence in the matter is being formed. The Court of Justice of the European Union has not yet ruled on the preliminary questions addressed to it. It remains to be seen in which area this situation will be directed.
Review, so the following question reached the supreme court: can the driver's mobile country email list phone in the car be assimilated to a taxi meter? ! The answer was that a taximeter does not include a device that receives GPS signals during a journey and transmits the GPS data to a server located outside the vehicle, which calculates a fare that is determined in part or in whole by reference to the which , then sends the fare-related information back to the device. The court stated that while the smartphone using the driver's app may be essential to enable fare calculation, this does not make it a fare calculation device . As a result, the app was found to be legal in London. Another court in London ruled in a case that.
Uber drivers are employees entitled to the minimum wage, paid vacation, sick leave and other normal worker rights, rather than self-employed. States that did not object At the opposite pole, however, there are also states where the company has not encountered firm opposition or where the legislation does not contain specific limitations regarding this type of activity, thus being allowed. Among them are Switzerland, Russia, Greece. As technology evolves more and more and the legal issues, in turn, diversify, so that at the moment the jurisprudence in the matter is being formed. The Court of Justice of the European Union has not yet ruled on the preliminary questions addressed to it. It remains to be seen in which area this situation will be directed.